« Is Organic in an End Game? | Main | Ice Tea for 6 Cents a Glass, Low-Carbon Too »

July 07, 2009

Comments

If you look at the totality of Merrigan's remarks on this subject, I think it comes out as essentially ambiguous:

"But, the honeymoon is over. It’s time to show the world that our standards have teeth; that we mean them and if people are not adhering to the standards, they’re going to be kicked out of the program. It will take staff work and it will take eyes out in the field because the USDA can’t be everywhere all the time. Part of our enforcement program has to be based on whistle blowing within the industry itself.

I’m going to tell you what I think the biggest challenge is—and I know I’m like a broken record on this, or a broken CD or iPhone—but the point is that the biggest challenge the organic community faces is internal. It is about not letting the “perfect” be the enemy of the “good”; not to self-destruct by pointing accusing fingers at each other.

There’s definitely a need for whistle blowing on enforcement issues, but I think this community sometimes explodes issues unnecessarily on the front pages of the newspapers, which leads to consumer confusion and erosion in belief for the organic label. People need to keep their eyes on the prize and think of this as a long-term haul and to just be really cautious before they throw bombs."

So--- whistleblowers are needed, but should not present their complaints to the newspapers.
I cannot detect anything here which is new. Furthermore, there has never been an NOP enforcement action with fines specified in the regulations. Will there now be such?
I understand that USDA cannot be everywhere, but one staff member spending a week visiting retailers around the US, could easily compile a list of several thousand violations simply on the basis of obvious mislabeling.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Book